Is the iPhone 4 Faster on AT&T or Verizon?

When Verizon launched its own version of the iPhone in February–ending the long exclusive deal that AT&adenosine monophosphate;T had affected with Orchard apple tree to sell the watershed phone–many AT&T iPhone users rejoiced. Finally, iPhone lovers could have their beloved twist and connect information technology to a network with decent information speeds and fewer born calls. Some of them left their AT&T plans then and there, and bought a Verizon iPhone. Simply any AT&T customers still waiting for their contracts to run proscribed mightiness observe our recent run results interesting–and instructive.

We have little doubt that the Verizon iPhone connects and holds articulation calls better than the AT&T iPhone does, but if you're a heavy information exploiter you mightiness neediness to reconsider the AT&T iPhone. (For a head-to-head look at the two phones' specs, see the comparing chart we created in January.) We tested the connection speeds of both the AT&ere;T iPhone 4 and the Verizon iPhone 4 in five western sandwich cities, and recorded faster data speeds on AT&T's version of the call.

Verizon iPhone Slower?

In early 2020, we tested the AT&T iPhone 4 in San Francisco, Capital of Costa Rica, Seattle, Portland, and San Diego. In those five West Coast cities, information technology clocked an medium download speed of 1.25 mbps and an average upload speed of 0.92 mbps. When we proven the Verizon iPhone 4 in San Francisco, San Jose, Seattle, Los Angeles, and Las Vegas, we registered an average download speed of 0.89 mbps and an average upload speed of 0.54 mbps.

Comparing just the ternion cities where we tested both the AT&T and Verizon iPhones, AT&T wins again. In our Seattle tests with AT&adenylic acid;T's iPhone, we saw a 1.34-mbps moderate on the downlink and 1.05 mbps on the uplink–nice-looking Book of Numbers for a 3G network. In our Verizon iPhone tests ii months later, we saw a somewhat slower result therein city: a 1.06-mbps average downstream speed and a 0.54-mbps upstream speed.

The unvarying matter happened in San Francisco and San Jose. While the AT&T iPhone achieved download speeds in the scope of 1.4 mbps in both cities and upload speeds of 0.73 mbps (San Francisco) and 0.92 mbps (Capital of Costa Rica), Verizon's iPhone averaged 1.10 mbps downstream in some cities, and upload speeds in the range of 0.5 mbps.

Of the 52 locations we tried, San Francisco's Bernal Heights documented the fastest download speed of all at 2.25 mbps, with a 0.72-mbps upload speed.

In Las Vegas and Los Angeles, the Verizon iPhone reached slower average download speeds, at 0.66 mbps and 0.55 mbps, respectively. Los Angeles saw the slowest average speeds by far, downloading faster than 0.5 mbps in only half of the 12 locations we proven. Similarly, the Verizon iPhone had uploads faster than 0.25 mbps in only incomplete of our Los Angeles testing locations.

Considerable Network Delay

During our tests we also measured the latency times for the Verizon iPhone. Latency refers to the time it takes for a one-person parcel of data to travel through with the meshwork. Reaction time multiplication of less than 100 milliseconds are ideal, while delays of less than 200 milliseconds usually won't cause broad impairments to services much Eastern Samoa VoIP and video chat.

The Verizon iPhone produced an average latency clip of 765 milliseconds crossways our quintuplet testing cities. Las Vegas had the best average latency time of the five cities we tested, at 249 milliseconds; Los Angeles clocked our slowest average latency time, at 2022 milliseconds. Considering that a mesh delay of more than 200 milliseconds put up cause delays in extremely time-sensitive services, that nifty front-facing camera in all likelihood won't do you much good if you'atomic number 75 in L.A. (unless you're in Santa Monica or Century Urban center, where our test phone saw great latent period times of 166 and 187 milliseconds, respectively).

Another Verizon Phones Faster

Our examination too shows that other Verizon phones–Android phones–may associate more efficaciously and more quickly with the Verizon CDMA network than the Verizon iPhone does. In San Francisco, San Jose, Seattle, Portland, and San Diego, Verizon's Motorola Droid 2 averaged 0.9 mbps for downloads and 0.62 mbps for uploads.

More bad newsworthiness for Verizon iPhone users: Big Red's CDMA network may be slowing as Verizon focuses on construction out its new 4G LTE network. Verizon powerfully denies this, merely our early 2020 tests with the Droid 2 showed that download speeds happening the Verizon 3G mesh had slowed 7 percent from the year before.

For immediately, it seems that an iPhone buyer would do asymptomatic to toy with whether voice calling or data capability is Thomas More decisive. If you're already on AT&T and you're thinking about jumping ship to Verizon, remember that while your call prize is likely to improve, data service on your Verizon iPhone might be a trifle slower.

In this comparison we've tried to give a general picture of how well the ii versions of the iPhone connect to their respective networks. Your own results in your own neighborhood might vary from ours, then it's critical that you find out for yourself how well a Verizon iPhone might work for your needs. Examining our data is a good start, merely asking your iPhone-victimisation friends and neighbors may be more predictive.

This whole topic may become irrelevant when the LTE-capable iPhone 5 comes out, perhaps this spring. The proper question whitethorn be whether to buy an iPhone 4 at all right immediately, regardless of carrier, operating theater to wait until the 4G goodness of the iPhone 5 becomes available.

How We Tried and true

Our testing method acting is designed to rough the experience of a real smartphone substance abuser on any donated day in their city. We travel rapidly-tried the Verizon iPhone 4 in ten to twelve testing locations spaced equally passim our five testing cities. At each testing location in apiece city, we took a "snapshot" of the performance of each radiocommunication service, using an Federal Communications Commission-authorised app made away Ookla to test for upload speed, download pelt along, and mesh latency. We looked for the fastest signal available in each location, and used that data to pass citywide averages.

Because tune signal quality depends to a large extent on variables such As network load, distance from the nearest mobile phone tower, weather, and the hour, our results can't be victimised to predict verbatim performance in a specific area. Rather, they illustrate the relative performance of radio set service of process in a given city on a given day.

Mark Sullivan and Armando Rodriguez of PCWorld contributed to this reputation.

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/490409/vziphone.html

Posted by: quachthismillond1969.blogspot.com

Share this post